Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
- Vote date
- 2025-05-07
- Chamber
- house
- Result
- passed
- Yeas
- 108
- Nays
- 1
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Related measure
- measure-178
- Related sitting
- sitting-45
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Rep. Posthumus moved that the bill be given immediate effect. The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. Rep. Glanville, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I’m voting no on these bills because, in the last session we passed the Clean Energy and Jobs Act. In that bill, there is a very clear process for working through the MPSC to consider cases such as the one this current package addresses. In fact, this exact case is currently working its way through that process and will be before the MPSC this fall. I think it’s important that we stand by the legislation we crafted after much hard work with stakeholders and let the process play out. If we jump ahead, it sets a dangerous precedent related to carve outs in the Clean Energy and Jobs Act legislation. Too often we ‘correct’ legislation before it has a chance to work. This creates confusion and inefficiency that results in unnecessary red tape. If the process reveals that tweaks are needed, we can address that later this year, and create a fix that addresses the process as a whole.” Rep. Hope, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: As much as I empathize with the Upper Peninsula’s unique situation, I cannot support this exception for power generated by internal combustion engines. Iron-ore mining and the industries that rely on it are vulnerable to real threats from high-level economic choices (i.e., tariffs). The threat posed by switching to clean energy pales in comparison.” House Bill No. 4178, entitled A bill to amend 1956 PA 218, entitled “The insurance code of 1956,” by amending section 1204c (MCL 500.1204c), as amended by 2017 PA 67. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Measure id
- measure-178
- Motion text
- Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:
- Nays
- 1
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Sitting id
- sitting-45
- Vote date
- 2025-05-07
- Vote id
- vote-1404
- Vote number
- 93
- Yeas
- 108
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays as follows:,” /votes/vote-1404.
/api/v1/votes/vote-1404