Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2025-10-29
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- adopted
- Yeas
- 18
- Nays
- 16
- Excused
- 3
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-2646
- Related sitting
- sitting-203
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Bayer Cherry McMorrow Shink Brinks Geiss Moss Singh Camilleri Hertel Polehanki Wojno Cavanagh Irwin Excused—3 Johnson Klinefelt McBroom Not Voting—0 In The Chair: Geiss The question being on the adoption of the concurrent resolution, Senator Singh requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 3
- Measure id
- measure-2646
- Motion text
- The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 16
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- adopted
- Sitting id
- sitting-203
- Vote date
- 2025-10-29
- Vote id
- vote-2317
- Vote number
- 289
- Yeas
- 18
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-2317.
/api/v1/votes/vote-2317