Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2025-10-30
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- adopted
- Yeas
- 19
- Nays
- 13
- Excused
- 5
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-1092
- Related sitting
- sitting-205
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- (This resolution was adopted on Wednesday, October 29, and a Point of Order was raised and postponed for the day. See Senate Journal No. 99, p. 1672.) Pending a ruling from the Chair, Senator Lauwers withdrew his Point of Order. Senator Lauwers moved that Senators Daley and Theis be excused from the balance of today’s session. The motion prevailed. Senator Singh moved to reconsider the vote by which the concurrent resolution was adopted. The motion prevailed. The question being on the adoption of the concurrent resolution, Senator Singh requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 5
- Measure id
- measure-1092
- Motion text
- The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 13
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- adopted
- Sitting id
- sitting-205
- Vote date
- 2025-10-30
- Vote id
- vote-2319
- Vote number
- 291
- Yeas
- 19
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-2319.
/api/v1/votes/vote-2319