Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2024-05-09
- Chamber
- house
- Result
- passed
- Yeas
- 103
- Nays
- 4
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Related measure
- measure-5867
- Related sitting
- sitting-498
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- The House agreed to the title of the bill. Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect. The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. Senate Bill No. 227, entitled A bill to amend 1973 PA 116, entitled “An act to provide for the protection of children through the licensing and regulation of child care organizations; to provide for the establishment of standards of care for child care organizations; to prescribe powers and duties of certain departments of this state and adoption facilitators; to provide penalties; and to repeal acts and parts of acts,” by amending sections 1, 2b, and 2c (MCL 722.111, 722.112b, and 722.112c), section 1 as amended by 2022 PA 208, section 2b as amended by 2007 PA 217, and section 2c as amended by 2017 PA 257. (The bill was passed on November 8, 2023, see House Journal No. 96 of 2023, p. 2390; returned in accordance with the request of the House, rules suspended, passage reconsidered, substitute (H-1) adopted and bill not passed, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, on January 17, see House Journal No. 3, p. 22.) Rep. Aiyash moved that Rule 63 be suspended. The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor. Rep. Aiyash moved to reconsider the vote by which the House did not pass the bill. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Measure id
- measure-5867
- Motion text
- The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 4
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Sitting id
- sitting-498
- Vote date
- 2024-05-09
- Vote id
- vote-3352
- Vote number
- 83
- Yeas
- 103
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:,” /votes/vote-3352.
/api/v1/votes/vote-3352