Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.

vote

Recorded floor vote

Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:

Vote date
2024-12-11
Chamber
house
Result
passed
Yeas
104
Nays
5
Excused
Not recorded
Not voting
Not recorded
Related measure
measure-4367
Related sitting
sitting-541

Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.

Inspect all published fields
Chamber
house
Context text
Cavitt Kuhn Paquette Wendzel DeBoyer Kunse Posthumus Wozniak DeSana Lightner Prestin Zorn In The Chair: Pohutsky The House agreed to the title of the bill. Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect. The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. Rep. Aiyash moved that House Bill No. 5022 be placed on its immediate passage. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. House Bill No. 5022, entitled A bill to amend 1967 PA 281, entitled “Income tax act of 1967,” by amending sections 813, 831, and 839 (MCL 206.813, 206.831, and 206.839), as added by 2021 PA 135. Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Excused
Not recorded
Measure id
measure-4367
Motion text
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Nays
5
Not voting
Not recorded
Result
passed
Sitting id
sitting-541
Vote date
2024-12-11
Vote id
vote-3715
Vote number
446
Yeas
104

Follow the evidence

Cite this record

Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:,” /votes/vote-3715.

/api/v1/votes/vote-3715