Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2023-05-10
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- passed
- Yeas
- 20
- Nays
- 18
- Excused
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-5838
- Related sitting
- sitting-590
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- “(4) The department must require that all new vehicles for use by motor carrier officers not be painted to look similar to those used by Michigan state police officers and that the motor carrier division develop and display a division logo that is significantly dissimilar to that used by Michigan state police.”. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Senator McBroom offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 35, following line 2, by inserting: “(4) The department must require that motor carrier division officers wear a uniform color other than dark blue and that motor officers specifically state that they are not police officers when they begin interactions/enforcement activities.”. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Senator Theis offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 16, following line 16, by inserting: “Sec. 218. If the state administrative board, acting under section 3 of 1921 PA 2, MCL 17.3, transfers funds from an amount appropriated under this article, the legislature may, by a concurrent resolution adopted by a majority of the members elected to and serving in each house, intertransfer funds within this article for the particular department, board, commission, officer, or institution.”. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Measure id
- measure-5838
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 18
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Sitting id
- sitting-590
- Vote date
- 2023-05-10
- Vote id
- vote-6975
- Vote number
- 197
- Yeas
- 20
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-6975.
/api/v1/votes/vote-6975