Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2023-05-10
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- failed
- Yeas
- 18
- Nays
- 20
- Excused
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-5840
- Related sitting
- sitting-590
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- In The Chair: Moss Senator Daley offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 49, following line 12, by inserting: “ Sec. 264a. (1) If any public university that receives an appropriation in section 236 sells or otherwise disposes of agricultural land owned by that university, the university shall submit a report including the following information to the house and senate subcommittees on higher education, the house and senate fiscal agencies, and the state budget director: (a) The location, size, and a legal description of the property that was sold. (b) The sales price of the property. (2) Upon receipt of a report under subsection (1), the state budget director shall reduce the next monthly payment described in section 241 by an amount equal to the sales price reported under subsection (1)(b). If a reduction under this subsection would cause the monthly payment to be a negative number, the state budget director shall instead completely withhold the next monthly payment, and reduce the subsequent payment by the difference between the sales price reported under subsection (1)(b) and the amount of the initial withheld payment. (3) Any payment withheld under this section shall be allowed to lapse at the end of the fiscal year, and shall not be disbursed to the university from which it was withheld. ”. The question being on the adoption of the amendment, Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Measure id
- measure-5840
- Motion text
- The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 20
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Sitting id
- sitting-590
- Vote date
- 2023-05-10
- Vote id
- vote-7000
- Vote number
- 222
- Yeas
- 18
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-7000.
/api/v1/votes/vote-7000