Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2023-05-10
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- failed
- Yeas
- 18
- Nays
- 20
- Excused
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-5830
- Related sitting
- sitting-590
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- (c) Improving windows, parking lots, and other areas.”. The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Senator Albert offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 158, following line 18, by inserting: “Sec. 1303. The department shall not contract with an organization that provides elective abortions, abortion counseling, or abortion referrals, for services that are to be funded with state restricted or state general fund/general purpose funds appropriated in part 1 for family planning local agreements. An organization under contract with the department shall not subcontract with an organization that provides elective abortions, abortion counseling, or abortion referrals, for services that are to be funded with state restricted or state general fund/general purpose funds appropriated in part 1 for family planning local agreements. Sec. 1304. The department shall not use state restricted funds or state general funds, or allow grantees or subcontractors to use those funds, appropriated in part 1 in the pregnancy prevention program or family planning local agreements appropriation line items for abortion counseling, referrals, or services. Sec. 1305. (1) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for family planning local agreements and the pregnancy prevention program, the department shall not contract with or award grants to an entity that engages in 1 or more of the activities described in section 1(1) of 2002 PA 360, MCL 333.1091, if the entity is located in a county or health district where family planning or pregnancy prevention services are provided by the county, the health district, or a qualified entity that does not engage in any of the activities described in section 1(1) of 2002 PA 360, MCL 333.1091. (2) The department shall give priority to counties or health districts where no contracts or grants currently exist for family planning or pregnancy prevention services before contracting with or awarding grants to an entity that engages in 1 or more of the activities described in section 1(1) of 2002 PA 360, MCL 333.1091, if that entity is located in a county where family planning and pregnancy prevention services are provided by the county, the health district, or another qualified entity that does not engage in the activities described in section 1(1) of 2002 PA 360, MCL 333.1091.”. The question being on the adoption of the amendment, Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Measure id
- measure-5830
- Motion text
- The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 20
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Sitting id
- sitting-590
- Vote date
- 2023-05-10
- Vote id
- vote-7009
- Vote number
- 231
- Yeas
- 18
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-7009.
/api/v1/votes/vote-7009