Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2023-06-06
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- unknown
- Yeas
- 38
- Nays
- 0
- Excused
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-5672
- Related sitting
- sitting-599
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- The bill was read a first and second time by title and referred to the Committee on Elections and Ethics. Senators Moss, McMorrow, Polehanki, McCann, Geiss, Shink and Brinks introduced Senate Bill No. 374, entitled A bill to amend 1954 PA 116, entitled “Michigan election law,” by amending sections 658 and 661 (MCL 168.658 and 168.661), as amended by 2012 PA 270. The bill was read a first and second time by title and referred to the Committee on Elections and Ethics. By unanimous consent the Senate returned to the order of Messages from the House Senate Bill No. 32, entitled A bill to amend 1978 PA 390, entitled “An act to regulate the time and manner of payment of wages and fringe benefits to employees; to prescribe rights and responsibilities of employers and employees, and the powers and duties of the department of labor; to require keeping of records; to provide for settlement of disputes regarding wages and fringe benefits; to prohibit certain practices by employers; to prescribe penalties and remedies; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts,” by amending section 8 (MCL 408.478). (This bill was returned from the House on Thursday, May 25 with a substitute (H-2) and immediate effect, and was laid over under the rules. See Senate Journal No. 51, p. 956.) The question being on concurring in the substitute made to the bill by the House, The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Measure id
- measure-5672
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Sitting id
- sitting-599
- Vote date
- 2023-06-06
- Vote id
- vote-7100
- Vote number
- 322
- Yeas
- 38
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-7100.
/api/v1/votes/vote-7100