Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2024-05-09
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- failed
- Yeas
- 16
- Nays
- 20
- Excused
- 2
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-6392
- Related sitting
- sitting-691
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- 3. Amend page 6, line 29, after “from” by striking out the balance of the page through “State” on line 2 of page 7 and inserting “ state ”. 4. Amend page 7, line 2, after “money” by striking out the balance of the line through “ $1,270,619,000.00. $1,314,162,400.00. ” on line 3 and inserting a period. 5. Amend page 8, line 20, after “state” by striking out the balance of the sentence and inserting “ general fund/general purpose money. ”. The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor. Senator Albert offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 66, following line 7, by inserting: “ Sec. 275o. (1) To receive funds under section 236(2), a public university may not spend more than 2.0% of its total general fund operations revenue from all sources on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives or programs, including staff salaries, benefits, and program operations. (2) By March 15, 2025 each university with a diversity, equity and inclusion program must report to the house and senate appropriations committees on their total diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives spending. The reporting must include, but is not limited to, a description of program goals, number of employees, and an overview of staff salaries and benefits.”. The question being on the adoption of the amendment, Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 2
- Measure id
- measure-6392
- Motion text
- The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 20
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- failed
- Sitting id
- sitting-691
- Vote date
- 2024-05-09
- Vote id
- vote-7655
- Vote number
- 137
- Yeas
- 16
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-7655.
/api/v1/votes/vote-7655