Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2024-12-10
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- passed
- Yeas
- 37
- Nays
- 0
- Excused
- 1
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-4422
- Related sitting
- sitting-751
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- any dwelling, but not of other properties, such as commercial or investment properties, owned by a judge. While I appreciate the intent of the legislation, we must balance the need for transparency and sunshine of our public officials. There is no need to exempt the addresses of properties owned by a judge that are not used for residential purposes, but instead are commercial or investment properties in nature. I ask for my colleagues’ support of this amendment. The following bill was read a third time: House Bill No. 5077, entitled A bill to amend 2019 PA 39, entitled “Administration of opioid antagonists act,” by amending the title and sections 103 and 107 (MCL 15.673 and 15.677), section 107 as amended by 2020 PA 321, and by adding section 106. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Measure id
- measure-4422
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Sitting id
- sitting-751
- Vote date
- 2024-12-10
- Vote id
- vote-7994
- Vote number
- 476
- Yeas
- 37
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-7994.
/api/v1/votes/vote-7994