Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Chamber
- senate
- Result
- unknown
- Yeas
- 20
- Nays
- 18
- Excused
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Related measure
- measure-4446
- Related sitting
- sitting-757
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Bellino Hoitenga McBroom Theis Bumstead Huizenga Nesbitt Victory Daley Johnson Outman Webber Damoose Lauwers Runestad Excused—0 Not Voting—1 Wojno In The Chair: Geiss Senator Singh moved to reconsider the vote by which the House substitute was not concurred in. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the House substitute made to the Senate substitute, The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 0
- Measure id
- measure-4446
- Motion text
- The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 18
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- unknown
- Sitting id
- sitting-757
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote id
- vote-8181
- Vote number
- 663
- Yeas
- 20
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The substitute was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:,” /votes/vote-8181.
/api/v1/votes/vote-8181