Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
vote
Recorded floor vote
The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Vote date
- 2021-10-27
- Chamber
- house
- Result
- passed
- Yeas
- 55
- Nays
- 48
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Related measure
- measure-7561
- Related sitting
- sitting-847
Official totals and named choices remain separate evidence. A named choice supports that vote only and does not establish continuous presence.
Inspect all published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- Cherry Lasinski Sabo Yaroch Clemente Lilly Shannon In The Chair: Hornberger The House agreed to the title of the bill. Rep. LaGrand, under Rule 31, made the following statement: “Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I did not vote on Roll Call No. 502 because of a possible conflict of interest.” Rep. Frederick moved to reconsider the vote by which the House passed the bill. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Measure id
- measure-7561
- Motion text
- The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 48
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Sitting id
- sitting-847
- Vote date
- 2021-10-27
- Vote id
- vote-8756
- Vote number
- 503
- Yeas
- 55
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “The bill was then passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:,” /votes/vote-8756.
/api/v1/votes/vote-8756