Script-free record · Release 2026-07-28.3
Committee vote · prevailed · 5–0–0
Core facts and links below come from the same immutable public release as the enhanced record page.
committee vote
Recorded committee decision
to adopt substitute (H-1) to HR 19.
- Meeting date
- Not recorded
- Result
- prevailed
- Yeas
- 5
- Nays
- 0
- Validation
- consistent
- Related meeting
- meeting-3
A committee motion is a proceeding-level decision. A named choice supports that individual vote only and does not establish continuous attendance.
Inspect all published fields
- Canonical name
- Mike Harris
- Committee vote id
- committee-vote-285540
- Evidence text
- Representative Harris moved to adopt substitute (H-1) to HR 19. The motion prevailed 5-0-0: FAVORABLE ROLL CALL Yeas: Reps. BeGole, Harris, VanderWall, Fitzgerald and McFall Nays: None Pass: None Representative Harris testified in support of HR 19. Questions and discussion followed. The following people submitted a card in opposition to HR 19, but did not wish to speak: Dana Paglia-King, representing the National Association of Social Workers. Ross Fisher. Alicia Guevara - Warren, representing Think Babies Michigan. Khadja Erickson, representing The Hubris Collective. Elinor Jordan, representing the Michigan Immigration Rights Council, testified in opposition to HR 19. HJR A (Rep. Bollin) A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the state constitution of 1963, by amending section 26 of article IV, to require approval by two-thirds of the members elected to and serving in each house of the legislature for certain bills. HR 19 (Rep. Hall) A resolution to amend the Standing Rules of the House of Representatives. Liz Balck, representing the American Civil Liberties Union, testified in opposition to HR 19. Monique Stanton, representing the Michigan League for Public Policy, testified in opposition to HR 19. Nicole Keway Biber, representing the Anishinaabek Caucus, testified in opposition to HR 19. Julie Powers, representing Immigration Law and Justice Michigan, testified in opposition to HR 19. Viviana Alamillo, representing Mi Poder, testified in opposition to HR 19. Marita Ky testified in opposition to HR 19. The following people submitted a card in opposition to HR 19, but due to the time constraints were unable to speak: Rachel Udabe. Sarah Long, representing the American Citizens Against Obvious Evil. Representative McFall offered the following amendments to HR 19: 1. Amend page 2, line 2, after “item” by adding a comma and inserting “other than obligated spending,”. 2. Amend page 2, line 9, after “item” by adding a comma and inserting “other than obligated spending,”. 3. Amend page 3, following line 27, by inserting: “(d) “Obligated spending” means constitutional or statutory revenue sharing with a municipality, constitutional support to a university, or statutorily obligated spending to a university.”.
- Meeting id
- meeting-3
- Member id
- member-14
- Motion text
- to adopt substitute (H-1) to HR 19.
- Mover label
- Harris
- Nays
- 0
- Passes
- 0
- Position
- 4
- Resolution method
- unique surname
- Result
- prevailed
- Service id
- service-21
- Validation state
- consistent
- Yeas
- 5
Follow the evidence
Cite this record
Michigan Legislative Activity and Evidence Dataset, release 2026-07-28.3, “Committee vote · prevailed · 5–0–0,” /committee-votes/committee-vote-285540.
/api/v1/committee-votes/committee-vote-285540