Michigan Legislative Activity Ledger

Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3

Related roll calls

Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.

← Back to the script-free parent record

Showing 4 related records on this page. A total was not computed.

  1. Related record

    as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    Elder Hope Pagan Witwer Ellison Johnson, C. Peterson Yancey Garrett Jones Pohutsky In The Chair: Lilly The House agreed to the title of the bill. Rep. Cole moved that the bill be given immediate effect. The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor. House Bill No. 6333, entitled A bill to amend 1893 PA 58, entitled “An act to provide for selecting seats for members in the hall of the house of representatives,” by amending section 1 (MCL 4.61). Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-13669
    Motion text
    as follows:
    Nays
    45
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    unknown
    Sitting id
    sitting-1341
    Vote date
    2020-12-02
    Vote id
    vote-11352
    Vote number
    506
    Yeas
    59
  2. Related record

    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    A bill to amend 1893 PA 58, entitled “An act to provide for selecting seats for members in the hall of the house of representatives,” by amending section 1 (MCL 4.61). The question being on the passage of the bill, Senator McBroom offered the following substitute: Substitute (S-1). The question being on the adoption of the substitute, Senator McBroom withdrew the substitute. Senator McBroom offered the following amendment: 1. Amend page 3, following line 5, by inserting: “ (5) This act does not apply if section 54 of article IV of the state constitution of 1963 is repealed or is amended after the effective date of the amendatory act that added this subsection. ”. The amendment was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on the passage of the bill, The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    1
    Measure id
    measure-13669
    Motion text
    The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    16
    Not voting
    1
    Result
    passed
    Sitting id
    sitting-1566
    Vote date
    2020-12-18
    Vote id
    vote-12539
    Vote number
    631
    Yeas
    20
  3. Related record

    The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    senate
    Context text
    Whereas, The tremendous uptick in absentee voting demonstrated that our election laws are inadequate to protect the integrity and legitimacy of the election. Because substantial absentee voting is likely the new reality, proper changes to our election laws must be made to ensure citizens can be confident in future election results. Looking to best practices across other states, we must institute proper early processing of absentee ballots, update and clean up the Qualified Voter File, and ensure proper verification of voter identity that does not impede the right to vote, among other potential changes; and Whereas, Ongoing robust legislative oversight through committee work and other means are rightly reviewing the November 2020 election and our election processes. Legislative oversight is an important tool that can be utilized to reveal fraud, vulnerabilities, and irregularities; dispel myths and rumors; and inform policy changes that should be made to our election system; and Whereas, Both the Senate Oversight Committee and the House Oversight Committee have met numerous times and continue to meet to hear concerns and review information related to Michigan’s elections. The committees have heard testimony from concerned citizens, poll challengers, county clerks, and other parties, and that testimony has already revealed potential election reforms to consider. The committees have also issued multiple subpoenas to collect documents and information, which help inform their work; and Whereas, In addition to legislative oversight, continued prosecutorial review of many items regarding the November 2020 election is warranted. Allegations of fraud and irregularities, such as deceased persons voting, mismatched signatures on absentee ballots, error-prone voting equipment, and other things demand a thorough prosecutorial investigation. Additionally, knowingly false accusations and the propagation of rumors designed to create mistrust and deceive the public should be exposed and prosecuted to the maximum extent possible. Such investigations are particularly suited to root out violations of the law and highlight prudent reforms and function to maintain a heritage of peaceful transitions of power and of solving our differences and disputes through the political process rather than through violence or tyranny; now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That we call for a continued commitment to investigating allegations of fraud and irregularities in our elections, to considering and implementing reforms to improve our elections and audit processes, and to restoring citizens’ faith in the accuracy and integrity of elections in Michigan. Pending the order that, under rule 3.204, the concurrent resolution be referred to the Committee on Government Operations, Senator MacGregor moved that the rule be suspended. The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor. The question being on the adoption of the concurrent resolution, Senator MacGregor requested the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor. The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Excused
    1
    Measure id
    measure-13669
    Motion text
    The concurrent resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
    Nays
    16
    Not voting
    0
    Result
    adopted
    Sitting id
    sitting-1566
    Vote date
    2020-12-18
    Vote id
    vote-12545
    Vote number
    637
    Yeas
    21
  4. Related record

    follows:

    Open script-free record →

    Inspect published fields
    Chamber
    house
    Context text
    house of representatives,” by amending section 1 (MCL 4.61). The Senate has amended the bill as follows: 1. Amend page 3, following line 5, by inserting: “(5) This act does not apply if section 54 of article IV of the state constitution of 1963 is repealed or is amended after the effective date of the amendatory act that added this subsection.”. The Senate has passed the bill as amended and ordered that it be given immediate effect. The Speaker announced that pursuant to Rule 42, the bill was laid over one day. Rep. Cole moved that Rule 42 be suspended. The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor. The question being on concurring in the amendment made to the bill by the Senate, The amendment was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
    Excused
    Not recorded
    Measure id
    measure-13669
    Motion text
    follows:
    Nays
    42
    Not voting
    Not recorded
    Result
    unknown
    Sitting id
    sitting-1350
    Vote date
    2020-12-21
    Vote id
    vote-11496
    Vote number
    650
    Yeas
    60