Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Related roll calls
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 3 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- The House agreed to the title of the bill.
Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
Rep. Lightner, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
This allows a fee carveout to continue for the City of Detroit. Marriage fees should be the same in the entire state.”
Rep. Bollin, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
I support raising the minimum age of consent to 18 but cannot support allowing one county to charge a different fee than other counties and using a population threshold from 2010. The $20 fee charged by a county is lowered from 2 million to 1.5 million as per the 2010 census, which would allow Wayne County to change the fee.”
House Bill No. 4295, entitled
A bill to amend 1897 PA 180, entitled “An act to provide for the issuance of marriage licenses and certificates without publicity in certain cases; and to provide criminal and civil penalties for violation of this act,” by amending section 1 (MCL 551.201), as amended by 1983 PA 199.
Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- Was read a third time and passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 5
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2023-06-21
- Vote number
- 185
- Yeas
- 104
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Context text
- Excused—1
Lauwers
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: President
Senator Singh moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
The Senate agreed to the title of the bill.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 4295, entitled
A bill to amend 1897 PA 180, entitled “An act to provide for the issuance of marriage licenses and certificates without publicity in certain cases; and to provide criminal and civil penalties for violation of this act,” by amending section 1 (MCL 551.201), as amended by 1983 PA 199.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Excused
- 1
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Nays
- 3
- Not voting
- 0
- Result
- passed
- Vote date
- 2023-06-27
- Vote number
- 393
- Yeas
- 34
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- house
- Context text
- A bill to amend 1949 PA 300, entitled “Michigan vehicle code,” by amending sections 83 and 304 (MCL 257.83 and 257.304), section 83 as added by 2020 PA 383 and section 304 as amended by 2020 PA 376.
The bill was read a second time.
Rep. Aiyash moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.
The motion prevailed.
By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Messages from the Senate
The Speaker laid before the House
House Bill No. 4295, entitled
A bill to amend 1897 PA 180, entitled “An act to provide for the issuance of marriage licenses and certificates without publicity in certain cases; and to provide criminal and civil penalties for violation of this act,” by amending section 1 (MCL 551.201), as amended by 1983 PA 199.
(The bill was received from the Senate on June 27, with substitute (S-1) and immediate effect given by the Senate, consideration of which, under the rules, was postponed until June 28, see House Journal No. 60, p. 1054.)
The question being on concurring in the substitute (S-1) made to the bill by the Senate,
The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Excused
- Not recorded
- Motion text
- The substitute (S-1) was concurred in, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows:
- Nays
- 5
- Not voting
- Not recorded
- Result
- unknown
- Vote date
- 2023-09-06
- Vote number
- 269
- Yeas
- 102