The joint resolution was adopted, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor, as follows: The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
By unanimous consent the Senate proceeded to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
Senator Lauwers moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following joint resolution and bill:
Senate Joint Resolution G
House Bill No. 4728
The motion prevailed.
The following joint resolution was read a third time:
Senate Joint Resolution G,
The joint resolution was adopted, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor, as follows: House Joint Resolution R
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
By unanimous consent the Senate proceeded to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
Senator Lauwers moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following joint resolution:
House Joint Resolution R
The motion prevailed.
The following joint resolution was read a third time:
House Joint Resolution R, entitl
as follows: The joint resolution was read a second time.
Rep. Wentworth moved that the joint resolution be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.
The motion prevailed.
Rep. Frederick moved that the joint resolution be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
House Joint Resolution R, entitled
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the state
as follows: Nays—2
Berman Carra
In The Chair: Hornberger
The House agreed to the title of the bill.
Rep. Frederick moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
House Joint Resolution D, entitled
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the state constitution of 1963, by amending sections 16 and
27 of article IV, to allow for the suspension of salaries and expense allowances for legislators, and to modify
certain effective da
follows: Rep. Cole moved that the joint resolution be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.
The motion prevailed.
Rep. Cole moved that the joint resolution be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
Senate Joint Resolution G.
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the state constitution of 1963, by amending section 11 of
article I, to req
Was read a third time and not adopted, 2/3 of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows: Announcements by the Clerk
August 21, 2025
Received from the Auditor General a copy of the:
Scott E. Starr
Clerk of the House
By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
Rep. Posthumus moved that House Joint Resolution M be placed on its immediate passage.
The motion prevailed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
House Joint Resolu
as follows: The bill was read a second time.
Rep. Albert moved to substitute (H-1) the bill.
The motion prevailed and the substitute (H-1) was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
Rep. Thanedar moved that the bill be placed on the order of Third Reading of Bills.
The motion prevailed.
By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
Senate Joint Resolution G, entitled
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the state constitution of 1963,
follows: Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That we memorialize the federal
government to provide direct aid to state and local governments; and be it further
Resolved, That copies of this resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, the Speaker
of the United States House of Representatives, the President of the United States Senate, and the members
of the Michigan congressional delegation.
The concurrent resolution was referred to the Committee
as follows: By unanimous consent the House returned to the order of
Third Reading of Bills
House Joint Resolution U, entitled
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the state constitution of 1963, by amending section 21 of
article V and section 5 of article VIII, to modify the nominating process for the secretary of state and attorney
general, to provide for gubernatorial appointment of the members of the governing boards of the University
of Michigan, Michigan State University, and Wayne
Was read a third time and not adopted, 2/3 of the members serving not voting therefor, by yeas and nays, as follows: Edwards McKinney Rogers
In The Chair: Smit
The House agreed to the title of the bill.
Rep. Posthumus moved that the bill be given immediate effect.
The motion prevailed, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
______
Rep. Paiz, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
The joint resolution was adopted, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor, as follows: Not Voting—0
In The Chair: President
The question being on concurring in the committee recommendation to give the bill immediate effect,
The recommendation was concurred in, 2/3 of the members serving voting therefor.
Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:
“An act to revise, consolidate, and classify the laws relating to the insurance and surety business;
The Joint Committee on Administrative Rules submitted the following:
Meeting held on Tuesday, March 22, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., Room 1100, Binsfeld Office Building
Present: Senators Bumstead (C), McBroom, Theis, Hollier and Irwin
The following communication was received:
Office of Senator Erika Geiss
March 22, 2022
Please list me as a co-sponsor for Senate Bill 969 of 2022 as introduced by Senator Dayna Polehanki. Do not hesitate to reach out to my office if there are any questions or concerns