Script-free related records · Release 2026-07-28.3
Recent named vote choices
Follow collected relationships through the same typed, immutable public API used by the enhanced record.
← Back to the script-free parent record
Showing 25 related records on this page. A total was not computed.
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- yea
- Choice id
- choice-488464
- Context text
- “An act to grant scholarships to students enrolled in postsecondary education institutions; and to provide
for the administration of the scholarship program,”
The Senate agreed to the full title.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5636, entitled
A bill to amend 1978 PA 368, entitled “Public health code,” by amending sections 2811, 2823, 17101,
20104, 20106, and 20161 (MCL 333.2811, 333.2823, 333.17101, 333.20104, 333.20106, and 333.20161),
section 2811 as amended by 1998 PA 332, section 17101 as added by 2016 PA 417, section 20104 as
amended by 2022 PA 187, section 20106 as amended by 2017 PA 167, and section 20161 as amended by
2023 PA 138, and by adding sections 2823a and 22224c and part 207.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 2
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 735
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488450
- Context text
- pushes policies for the sake of generating headlines without sufficient evaluation of whether they achieve
their intended outcomes or not. I ask colleagues to join me in voting “yes” on this amendment.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5829, entitled
A bill to amend 1964 PA 208, entitled “An act to grant scholarships to students enrolled in postsecondary
education institutions; and to provide for the administration of the scholarship program,” by amending
sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 (MCL 390.972, 390.973, 390.974, 390.975, 390.975a, 390.976,
390.977, 390.978, 390.979, and 390.980), sections 3 and 4 as amended by 2021 PA 40, section 5 as amended
by 1986 PA 270, sections 6, 8, and 9 as amended by 1980 PA 500, and section 7 as amended by 2004 PA 181;
and to repeal acts and parts of acts.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 734
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488422
- Context text
- Senator Theis offered the following amendment:
1. Amend page 14, following line 25, by inserting:
“(h) A grant agreement must include a provision that requires the recipient of the grant to have
and maintain an employee workforce that is comprised of at least 75% of employees who are residents
of this state.”.
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.
Senator Lauwers offered the following amendments:
1. Amend page 12, line 3, after “September 30,” by striking out “2054,” and inserting “2030,”.
2. Amend page 15, line 6, by striking out “2054.” and inserting “2029.”.
The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 36
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 733
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488384
- Context text
- Pursuant to Joint Rule 20, the full title of the act shall be inserted to read as follows:
“An act to create certain funds; to provide for the allocation of certain revenues among certain funds and
for the operation, investment, and expenditure of certain funds; and to impose certain duties and requirements
on certain state officials,”
The Senate agreed to the full title.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5652, entitled
A bill to amend 2003 PA 296, entitled “Michigan early stage venture investment act of 2003,” by amending
sections 7, 31, and 33 (MCL 125.2237, 125.2261, and 125.2263), section 7 as amended by 2015 PA 192 and
section 31 as amended by 2015 PA 193.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 36
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 732
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488346
- Context text
- House Bill No. 5653
House Bill No. 5829
House Bill No. 5636
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5651, entitled
A bill to amend 2000 PA 489, entitled “Michigan trust fund act,” by amending sections 7 and 8
(MCL 12.257 and 12.258), section 7 as amended by 2023 PA 139 and section 8 as amended by 2014 PA 504.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 36
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 731
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488298
- Context text
- Senator Chang offered the following substitute:
Substitute (S-2).
The question being on the adoption of the substitute,
Senator Cherry offered the following amendment to the substitute:
1. Amend page 6, line 21, after “(7)” by striking out the balance of the line through “(5).” on line 24 and
inserting “The certified list under subsection (5) must include all violent crimes reported to the
department of state police and must only represent the geographical areas of each county, village, and
township. The certified list under subsection (5) must only include cities, villages, or townships.”.
The amendment to the substitute was adopted.
The substitute as amended was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 730
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488260
- Context text
- House Bill No. 4606
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 4605, entitled
A bill to amend 1933 PA 167, entitled “General sales tax act,” by amending section 25 (MCL 205.75), as
amended by 2023 PA 20.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Chang offered the following substitute:
Substitute (S-2).
The substitute was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting therefor.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 729
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488222
- Context text
- Bumstead Hoitenga Nesbitt Victory
Daley Huizenga Outman
Excused—0
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: President
The Senate agreed to the title of the bill.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5551, entitled
A bill to amend 1954 PA 116, entitled “Michigan election law,” by amending sections 22c and 24b
(MCL 168.22c and 168.24b), section 22c as added by 1995 PA 261.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 728
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- yea
- Choice id
- choice-488160
- Context text
- poll book matches the number of the ballot, because these ballots are no longer numbered.
Why? What is the problem? Where did we have the need for this? Because we didn’t have a committee
hearing on it, that I can remember, I’m not aware of what the need is. And so I voted “no” because it just
doesn’t seem like there was a big problem out in the countryside with this issue, and now we’ve potentially
created a problem of keeping our ballots straight, and making sure that the books line up and balance, and
unbalanced books are always a bad sign in an election and create additional havoc. That’s why I voted “no.”
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 6053, entitled
A bill to amend 1969 PA 161, entitled “An act to regulate the filing of certain actions involving elections,”
by amending section 1 (MCL 691.1031); and to repeal acts and parts of acts.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 2
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 727
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488146
- Context text
- problem. This bill, unfortunately, misses the mark, and that’s why I voted “no.”
Senator Singh moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following bills:
House Bill No. 6052
House Bill No. 6053
House Bill No. 5551
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 6052, entitled
A bill to amend 1954 PA 116, entitled “Michigan election law,” by amending sections 570, 795b, and 797a
(MCL 168.570, 168.795b, and 168.797a), as amended by 2023 PA 81.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 726
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488118
- Context text
- Senator Lauwers asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the
statement be printed in the Journal.
The motion prevailed.
Senator Lauwers’ statement is as follows:
I’m so appreciative that we could have that reading of the bill, but I still find myself asking questions. Can
someone just tell me what this bill does?
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5695, entitled
A bill to amend 1939 PA 280, entitled “The social welfare act,” (MCL 400.1 to 400.119b) by adding
section 109p.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 36
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 725
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- yea
- Choice id
- choice-488050
- Context text
- Senator Singh moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following bills:
House Bill No. 4854
House Bill No. 5695
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 4854, entitled
A bill to amend 1976 PA 451, entitled “The revised school code,” (MCL 380.1 to 380.1852) by adding
section 1300.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 6
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 724
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-488039
- Context text
- The Senate agreed to the full title.
Senator Singh moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following bill:
House Bill No. 6166
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 6166, entitled
A bill to amend 1980 PA 383, entitled “Convention and tourism marketing act,” by amending section 3
(MCL 141.883).
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 33
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 723
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- yea
- Choice id
- choice-487978
- Context text
- the competency of evidence at the trial of persons accused of crime; to provide immunity from prosecution
for certain witnesses appearing at criminal trials; to provide for liability for damages; and to repeal certain
acts and parts of acts inconsistent with or contravening any of the provisions of this act,”
The Senate agreed to the full title.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 5888, entitled
A bill to amend 1927 PA 175, entitled “The code of criminal procedure,” by amending section 16l of
chapter XVII (MCL 777.16l), as amended by 2016 PA 150.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 10
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 722
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- yea
- Choice id
- choice-487940
- Context text
- The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
Points of Order
Senator Lauwers raised the Point of Order that he requests House Bill No. 5887 be read in full, as is his
constitutional prerogative.
Senator Singh raised the Point of Order that the motion is no longer debatable.
The President, Lieutenant Governor Gilchrist, ruled that Senator Lauwers’ Point of Order is rejected. The
Majority Floor Leader moved the previous question, which was ordered without objection, after which
Senator Lauwers entered the Point of Order and attempted to make a motion within that Point of Order—
that motion is out of order inside of a Point of Order after the previous question had been called.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 10
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 721
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-487925
- Context text
- Senator Lindsey asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement.
Point of Order
Senator Singh raised the Point of Order that the speaker needs to keep to the content of the bill.
The President pro tempore, Senator Moss, ruled that the speaker needs to keep to the content of the policies
of the bill.
By unanimous consent the Senate returned to consideration of the following bill:
House Bill No. 4485, entitled
A bill to amend 1927 PA 175, entitled “The code of criminal procedure,” by amending section 24 of
chapter VII (MCL 767.24), as amended by 2018 PA 182.
(This bill was read a third time earlier today. See p. 2247.)
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 33
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 720
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- yea
- Choice id
- choice-487856
- Context text
- Anthony Chang McCann Santana
Bayer Cherry McDonald Rivet Shink
Brinks Geiss McMorrow Singh
Camilleri Irwin Moss Wojno
Cavanagh Klinefelt Polehanki
Excused—0
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: President
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 2
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 719
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- yea
- Choice id
- choice-487826
- Context text
- The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Johnson offered the following amendment:
1. Amend page 11, line 16, after “(b)” by striking out the balance of the subdivision and inserting
“Whichever of the following is applicable:
(i) If the debtor’s garnishable earnings for the week are less than $1,925.00, 15% of the earnings.
(ii) If the debtor’s garnishable earnings for the week are $1,925.00 or more, 25% of the earnings.”.
The question being on the adoption of the amendment,
Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The Senators being equally divided (yeas 19; nays 19), the Lieutenant Governor voted “nay.”
The amendment was not adopted, a majority of the members serving and the Lieutenant Governor not
voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 10
- Result
- unknown
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 718
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- yea
- Choice id
- choice-487780
- Context text
- support the legislation, and urge my colleagues to join me in voting “no” on House Bill No. 4675.
Senator Singh moved that the Senate proceed to consideration of the following bill:
House Bill No. 4901
The motion prevailed.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 4901, entitled
A bill to amend 1961 PA 236, entitled “Revised judicature act of 1961,” by amending section 5451
(MCL 600.5451), as amended by 2012 PA 451.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 2
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 717
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-487766
- Context text
- communities to retain their voice so they are not forced to subsidize service they do not receive.
I ask for a “yes” vote on my amendment to continue providing Oakland County residents with the ability
to opt out.
Point of Order
Senator Singh raised the Point of Order that the debate is not germane to the bill.
The President pro tempore, Senator Moss, ruled that the debate is not germane to the bill.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 4675, entitled
A bill to amend 2003 PA 258, entitled “Land bank fast track act,” by amending sections 4, 13, and 14
(MCL 124.754, 124.763, and 124.764).
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 716
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-487728
- Context text
- Anthony Chang Klinefelt Polehanki
Bayer Cherry McCann Santana
Brinks Geiss McDonald Rivet Shink
Camilleri Hertel McMorrow Singh
Cavanagh Irwin Moss Wojno
Excused—0
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: Moss
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 715
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- yea
- Choice id
- choice-487670
- Context text
- The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 6088, entitled
A bill to amend 1986 PA 196, entitled “Public transportation authority act,” by amending sections 8, 18,
and 29 (MCL 124.458, 124.468, and 124.479), sections 8 and 18 as amended by 2006 PA 175.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Webber offered the following amendments:
1. Amend page 6, line 12, after “of” by striking out “1,100,000” and inserting “1,500,000”.
2. Amend page 6, line 16, after “of” by striking out “1,100,000” and inserting “1,500,000”.
The question being on the adoption of the amendments,
Senator Lauwers requested the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered, 1/5 of the members present voting therefor.
The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The amendments were not adopted, a majority of the members serving not voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 6
- Result
- failed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 714
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-487652
- Context text
- Daley Johnson Outman Webber
Damoose Lauwers
Excused—0
Not Voting—0
In The Chair: Moss
The Senate agreed to the title of the bill.
The following bill was read a third time:
House Bill No. 6146, entitled
A bill to amend 1931 PA 328, entitled “The Michigan penal code,” by amending section 239
(MCL 750.239), as amended by 2010 PA 294.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 713
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-487614
- Context text
- the buying, selling, or carrying of certain firearms, gas ejecting devices, and electro-muscular disruption
devices without a license or other authorization; to provide for the forfeiture of firearms and electro-muscular
disruption devices under certain circumstances; to provide for penalties and remedies; to provide immunity
from civil liability under certain circumstances; to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state and local
agencies; to prohibit certain conduct against individuals who apply for or receive a license to carry a
concealed pistol; to make appropriations; to prescribe certain conditions for the appropriations; and to repeal
all acts and parts of acts inconsistent with this act,” by amending section 14 (MCL 28.434), as amended by
2010 PA 295.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
Senator Singh moved that the previous question be ordered.
The motion prevailed.
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 712
Related record
Open script-free record →
Inspect published fields
- Chamber
- senate
- Choice
- nay
- Choice id
- choice-487576
- Context text
- House Bill No. 6144, entitled
A bill to amend 1935 PA 59, entitled “An act to provide for the public safety; to create the Michigan state
police, and provide for the organization thereof; to transfer thereto the offices, duties and powers of the state
fire marshal, the state oil inspector, the department of the Michigan state police as heretofore organized, and
the department of public safety; to create the office of commissioner of the Michigan state police; to provide
for an acting commissioner and for the appointment of the officers and members of said department; to
prescribe their powers, duties, and immunities; to provide the manner of fixing their compensation; to
provide for their removal from office; and to repeal Act No. 26 of the Public Acts of 1919, being sections 556
to 562, inclusive, of the Compiled Laws of 1929, and Act No. 123 of the Public Acts of 1921, as amended, being
sections 545 to 555, inclusive, of the Compiled Laws of 1929,” (MCL 28.1 to 28.16) by adding section 5a.
The question being on the passage of the bill,
The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Is inferred
- No
- Member label
- McBroom
- Motion text
- The bill was passed, a majority of the members serving voting therefor, as follows:
- Position
- 26
- Result
- passed
- Service id
- service-296
- Vote date
- 2024-12-20
- Vote number
- 711